’s first public college entrance examination papers requested case with the final result, the court papers to the college entrance examination score may not be disclosed state secrets grounds,louboutin pas cher, dismissed Candidates Kotani query to the Beijing Education Examination papers claim. Case Description Gufen discrepancy candidates want to see papers in 2010,http://alienbee.net/new-world-war-z-banners-leave-a-path-of-destruction/#comment-420499, 19-year-old took part in a small valley entrance. After the exam, he conducted according to answers on subjects Gufen. However, results to be published later, but with his Gufen scores differ. Kotani wanted to know, on the Beijing Education Examination colleges admissions office to submit a request to open his own 2010 entrance comprehensive management,http://cgi.members.interq.or.jp/blue/marino/cgi-bin/br-51/glight.cgi, mathematics and foreign language papers. He explicitly require disclosure is the result of marked examination scripts. Examination Yuan not publicly denied the request papers July 15, 2010,http://cgi.www5d.biglobe.ne.jp/~deluxe/cgi-bin/yybbs.cgi,barbour sale, to respond to high-Admissions,hogan outlet, refused Kotani’s request. High Admissions said, according to relevant regulations, the college entrance examination score standards are state secrets level educational work matters,woolrich outlet, according to the Regulations on Open Government, are not public information. Although the questions, candidates and candidates’ responses dossier is not a secret, but also the content should not be disclosed after the examination,http://cgi.www5f.biglobe.ne.jp/~katsuki/yybbs/yybbs.cgi, and the only certain number of people to grasp, not allowed to diffusion and the public. So withheld Kotani 2010 college entrance examination papers. Examination Yuan court justified Kotani not publicly refused to accept the Haidian court administrative proceedings. Court of First Instance dismissed. Kotani “Government Information Disclosure Ordinance” and “examination Examination regulations” as the basis of an appeal to a hospital. One in the hospital after hearing that, according to the “Regulations on Open Government Information” requirement,hollister online shop, involving state secrets government information shall not be disclosed. “Education State Secrets and Confidentiality specific scope of regulations” also shows that national education national,http://www.farm-biz.co.jp/cgi-bin/light/light.cgi?page390=val</a>, provincial, district (city) level Examination score after the enable secret level standards are matters. Should not be disclosed after the examination questions and examination scripts as well as archival material candidates only certain number of people to grasp, not allowed to diffusion and the public. Although Kotani is requested to be disclosed after post marked examination scripts, but which involves the relevant assessment criteria. According to regulations, assessment criteria are secret-level considerations. Beijing Education Examination reply was not inappropriate, a small valley in the Court of Final Appeal dismissed the claims. Related Case Henan candidates check points to win the lawsuit in 2008,http://www.geol.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~environ/cgi-bin/lightlight.cgi?res=178192,barbour jacket, Henan Lankao County candidates Liu also encountered the same problem, he sued Henan High Admissions succeeded. Liu suspected entrance scoring a mistake,hollister deutschland, made through the school to check points Shengzhaoshengban correction applications. Shengzhaoshengban papers to require the disclosure of information that he did not refuse factual and legal basis. July 17, 2008, Liu successfully sued to require Shengzhaoshengban based on “Open Government Information”,http://bbs.nawan.com/viewthread.php?tid=4238469&extra=,doudoune moncler, to disclose their college entrance examination papers. Zhengzhou High-tech District Court of First Instance dismissed. Zhengzhou City Intermediate People’s Court upheld the opinion that, according to the “Regulations on Open Government Information”, Section 9 states: “The executive authorities meet the following basic requirements should take the initiative to open government information: (a) involving citizens, legal persons or other combinations itself interest ...... “Liu require the disclosure of the application of college entrance examination papers comply with these requirements. Court verdict revoked, ordered Shengzhaoshengban Liu publicly on its 2008 college entrance examination papers. This is also the country’s first case of public college entrance examination papers judgment case. Different applicable law experts say the verdict two different cases of the same nature,barbour sale, the court verdict why different On this issue,barbour outlet, China University of Politics and Administrative Law Professor Zhang Feng told reporters that the Court, as the judiciary, the secrets of the various industry sectors have not exclusive jurisdiction. For secret identification, look different fields relevant regulations. In the present case,http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~pikapika/BBS/joyful.cgi, the Ministry of Education to develop a “educational work on State Secrets and Confidentiality provisions specific scope” for secret areas have been defined,doudoune moncler pas cher, the provision also has the force of law, the Beijing Intermediate People’s Court as a basis for judgment is reasonable The. From the Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court hearing the case that local court judgments are based primarily on “Open Government Information”,woolrich, which is different from the district court in adjudicating such cases and apply the law and what legal effect on the issue of higher priority understanding of the difference. Professor Chang said that the current Supreme Court in respect of “Open Government Information Regulations,” the specific implementation for your feedback, which will be most of the government information disclosure as a principle, do not open as an exception, but also on the secrets to make further provisions to unify the country standards of justice. Edition text / reporter Wang Wei