The right strategy wins the war WeatherShop.com Gifts, gadgets, weather stations, software and more...click here!\
The Blogosphere
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Final Make-Up Applied in North Carolina

By Paul Chesser, Climate Strategies Watch

The Center for Climate Strategies and their fellow economic holocaust deniers in North Carolina continued their shenanigans this week as they formally released 56 recommendations to create artificial green jobs at the expense of useful ones. The state’s Climate Action Plan Advisory Group (CAPAG—sounds like some kind of garment, doesn’t it? “That’s one ugly CAPAG you’re wearing!") posted its final report this week, which is not dissimilar to what they’ve done with other state climate commissions.

What is different with North Carolina, as opposed to the other states, is that CCS went out of their way to go to an outside entity—Appalachian State University’s (should be called “Alternative") Energy Center—to conduct an additional economic analysis of their recommendations. The reason for this is obvious: my colleagues at the John Locke Foundation” have pounded away for over a year at CCS’s/CAPAG’s willful disregard for current climate science and trends; their absurd economic claims; and their suspect changing of numbers, seemingly on a whim. It got so bad that CCS felt the need to shore up their credibility by overhauling the personnel page on their Web site to emphasis more economics credentials.

Anyway, CCS subcontracted the Energy Center to put lipstick on their pig, and the ASU gang used a distinctly rosy shade (PDF) in doing so.

image

Here’s what the swine left on the CAPAG collar: a projection that the state would realize 15,000 new jobs, $565 million in “employee and proprietor income,” and $302 million in gross state product by 2020. Compare that to what the Beacon Hill Institute, who analyzed CAPAG’s recommendations for the Locke Foundation earlier this year, found: “By 2011, the state would shed more than 33,000 jobs, annual investment would drop by about $502.4 million, real disposable income by more than $2.2 billion, and real state Gross Domestic Product by about $4.5 billion.” So I guess the question boils down to, whose analysis do you believe: a political science graduate student’s or PhD economists’? Read more here.

A similar story is going on in many states including my home state of New Hampshire where the Governors’ NHDES committee without any real climatologist input (just the ravings of an unqualified Union of Concern Scientists alarmist) will be advancing their final plans tomorrow. They too promise nothing but benefits with plenty of green jobs and revenue, when in reality the hard working citizens may find themselves like many other states hurt by government intervention just as they have been with the federal government intervention in the banking and housing markets. The state has forgotten that New Hamsphire license plates have the slogan “live free or die”. 

Posted on 10/09 at 11:33 PM
(0) TrackbacksPermalink


Page 1 of 1 pages
Blogroll