The evidence of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that the apparent contemporary atmospheric CO2 increase is anthropogenic, is discussed and rejected. It is shown why the ice core method and its results must be rejected; and that current air CO2 measurements are not validated and their results subjectively “edited”. 

See Tom’s paper here and powerpoint presentation here

The three evidences of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that the apparent contemporary atmospheric CO2 increase is anthropogenic, is discussed and rejected. It is shown why the ice core method and its results must be rejected; and that current air CO2 measurements are not validated and their results subjectively “edited”. 

Further it is shown that carbon cycle modelling based on non-equilibrium models, remote from observed reality and chemical laws, made to fit non-representative data through the use of non-linear ocean evasion “buffer” correction factors constructed from a pre-conceived idea, constitute a circular argument and with no scientific validity.  See Tom’s paper here and powerpoint presentation here

Also you may check out Beck’s paper on CO2 in the Climate Library here Beck on CO2. Beck has shown that using chemical methods CO2 has been higher than at current levels in the 1800s and 1940s.

and this paper by Prof. Zbigniew Jaworowski on Climate Change: Incorrect information on pre-industrial CO2 here