Political Climate
Apr 27, 2007
Evidence of Health Problems with Use of Ethanol

By Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science Weblog

Thanks to Roger Pielke Sr. and Dev Niyogi for an important news report on the risk of ethanol vehicles on health. The article in Energy Daily is titled “Ethanol Vehicles Pose A Significant Risk To Human Health”

The text reads in part, “Ethanol is widely touted as an eco-friendly, clean-burning fuel. But if every vehicle in the United States ran on fuel made primarily from ethanol instead of pure gasoline, the number of respiratory-related deaths and hospitalizations would likely increase, according to a new study by Stanford University atmospheric scientist Mark Z. Jacobson. His findings are published in the April 18 online edition of the journal Environmental Science and Technology.
See Climate Science Weblog post

Apr 26, 2007
Could Global Warming Be Halted by Controlling the Weather

Wall Street Journal On-line

Frustrated with the limits of public policy to tackle global warming, some scientists say the time has come to engineer a way to control the weather. The idea might seem appealing, says a science scholar, but it could have potentially harmful ramifications.

Climate engineering has become a popular topic among a group of scientists who are skeptical of the potential other environmental remedies, from carbon taxes to alternative energy, James R. Fleming, a professor of science, technology and society at Colby College, writes in the Wilson Quarterly’s spring issue. But the potential fixes being discussed reflect an overconfidence in technology, Mr. Fleming says, as well as an ignorance of the history of failed efforts to control the weather. See full story here

Apr 26, 2007
New CBO Report Exposes Failures of Cap-and-Trade Schemes

According to the CBO report issued April 25th “Regardless of how the allowances were distributed, most of the cost of meeting a cap on CO2 emissions would be borne by consumers, who would face persistently higher prices for products such as electricity and gasoline. Those price increases would be regressive in that poorer households would bear a larger burden relative to their income than wealthier households would.

The CBO noted that the proposed cap-and-trade allocation method “would increase producers’ profits without lessening consumers’ costs. In essence, such a strategy would transfer income from energy consumers—among whom lower income households would bear disproportionately large burdens—to shareholders of energy companies, who are disproportionately higher-income households. .” CBO Report on Cap-and-Trade

Senator Inhofe of the EPW, noted in discussing the CBO report “Far from being good for the economy, as advocates say, C02 allocation schemes will disproportionately burden the poor, raise taxes, increase government spending, raise gas prices, raise home energy costs and decrease wages. It is hard to imagine the CBO issuing a more devastating indictment of proposed C02 cap-and-trade schemes. The CBO report should be viewed as a stern warning to our elected leaders to avoid symbolic solutions to an alleged climate ‘crisis’ that places the financial burden on America’s poor and working class.”

Page 608 of 616 pages « First  <  606 607 608 609 610 >  Last »