By Daniel Dale, Star Reporter
In the United States, the calendar year 1998 ranked as the hottest of them all – until someone checked the math. After a Toronto skeptic tipped NASA this month to one flaw in its climate calculations, the U.S. agency ordered a full data review. Days later, it put out a revised list of all-time hottest years. The Dust Bowl year of 1934 now ranks as hottest ever in the U.S. – not 1998.
More significantly, the agency reduced the mean U.S. “temperature anomalies” for the years 2000 to 2006 by 0.15 degrees Celsius. NASA officials have dismissed the changes as trivial. Even the Canadian (Dr. Stephen McIntyre) who spotted the original flaw says the revisions are “not necessarily material to climate policy.”
But the revisions have been seized on by conservative Americans, including firebrand radio host Rush Limbaugh, as evidence that climate change science is unsound. Said Limbaugh last Thursday: “What do we have here? We have proof of man-made global warming. The man-made global warming is inside NASA ... is in the scientific community with false data.” Read more here.
World Climate Report
Back in 2001, Richard Lindzen and colleagues made quite a stir in the climate community when they published a paper in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society in which they describe having possibly identified an “adaptive infrared iris” that opens and closes to keep the earth’s temperature fairly steady even in light of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.
In the Geophysical Research Letters. Satellite gurus Roy Spencer and John Christy teamed up again, along with colleagues William Braswell and Justin Hnilo to examine the associations between cloud cover and temperature that occur during intraseasonal oscillations that occur in the tropics.
What Spencer and colleagues found breathes new life into the iris hypothesis. Spencer’s team identified an increase in low-level water clouds during the warming phase of the tropical intraseasonal oscillations, but found that while the amount of high altitude ice clouds increased initially, they unexpectedly reversed course and rapidly declined as the temperatures continued to climb. This decline in ice clouds progressed until the temperatures peaked and began to fall again. Read more here.
Top) Low level atmospheric daily temperature anomalies averaged over the nine strongest intraseasonal oscillations identified by Spencer et al. (2007). (Bottom) Anomalous amount of water clouds (green line) and ice clouds (blue line) for each day averaged over the same nine events. (from Spencer et al., 2007).
By Dr. Vincent Gray, New Zealand Climate and Enviro Truth Newsletter NO. 154
Environmental fanatics who had confidently predicted the coming ice age in the 1970s changed tack in the 1980s when the climate took the upward path of its regular 65-70 year oscillation, and revived the greenhouse gas warming theory which had failed so miserably in 1896 when Svante Arrhenius first predicted it. He was just on the wrong part of the cycle, as the temperature fell for the following fifteen years, and the two world wars took the attention away from those inclined to doomsday predictions.
The problem with the greenhouse theory, which confidently predicts a steady global temperature increase as a result of increases in the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, is that this prediction is incapable of confirmation, because it is just not practically possible to obtain a reliable average temperature of the earth’s surface. Read more here.
By Ben Clerkin, UK Daily Mail
They were toys destined only to bob up and down in nothing bigger than a child’s bath - but so far they have floated halfway around the world. The armada of 29,000 plastic yellow ducks, blue turtles and green frogs broke free from a cargo ship 15 years ago. Since then they have travelled 17,000 miles, floating over the site where the Titanic sank, landing in Hawaii and even spending years frozen in an Arctic ice pack. And now they are heading straight for Britain. At some point this summer they are expected to be spotted on beaches in South-West England.
While the ducks are undoubtedly a loss to the bath-time fun of thousands of children, their adventures at sea have proved an innvaluable aid to science. See how in this story here.
Icecap Note: This confirms the penetration of Pacific water into the arctic especially during El Nino events as has been observed by Trenberth (1999) and Shimada of JAMSTEC (2005) and the link to the Atlantic as shown by Dmitrenko et al (2003). See this Icecap story.
By Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville
The widely accepted (albeit unproven) theory that manmade global warming will accelerate itself by creating more heat-trapping clouds is challenged this month in new research from The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Instead of creating more clouds, individual tropical warming cycles that served as proxies for global warming saw a decrease in the coverage of heat-trapping cirrus clouds, says Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist in UAHuntsville’s Earth System Science Center. That was not what he expected to find.
“All leading climate models forecast that as the atmosphere warms there should be an increase in high altitude cirrus clouds, which would amplify any warming caused by manmade greenhouse gases,” he said. “That amplification is a positive feedback. What we found in month-to-month fluctuations of the tropical climate system was a strongly negative feedback. As the tropical atmosphere warms, cirrus clouds decrease. That allows more infrared heat to escape from the atmosphere to outer space.”
See the full report on this important new peer-review paper in the American Geophysical Union’s “Geophysical Research Letters” on-line edition here.
Newsweek has used climate change as its cover story this week, under the title “The truth about denial”. The gist of the argument is that there is a well-funded “denial industry” which seeks to undermine the sound scientific basis for the prevailing concerns about human-induced climate change. Parallels are drawn with the tobacco industry lobby and, of course, all this is said to be taking place in the name of private profit.
This is the latest example of a deeply disturbing trend towards intolerance of dissenters, which has even led to some commentators suggesting Nuremberg-style trials of “climate criminals”. Such a febrile atmosphere is not conducive to rational thinking or discussion, so let’s take a deep breath, count to ten, and look at some of the facts.
The Scientific Alliance does not think that the prevailing IPCC view on the role of greenhouse gases is necessarily wrong. However, the evidence for it is circumstantial, there are a number of pieces of conflicting evidence, and alternative hypotheses have not all been properly evaluated. In the meantime, a complex, costly (and, at present, fairly ineffectual) set of policies for reduction of carbon intensity has been introduced. There is a danger that many countries are going further down what may prove to be a major policy cul-de-sac.
In these circumstances, people who have legitimate concerns to raise have an obligation to speak out. Constructive questioning of hypotheses serves to strengthen ones which are right and cause wrong ones to fail. How can scientists possibly object to that? See full newsletter here.
By Philip Klotzbach and William M. Gray
We have lowered our seasonal forecast slightly; however, we continue to call for a very active Atlantic basin hurricane season in 2007. We expect 13 named storms, 8 hurricanes and 4 intense hurricanes (CAT 3-5). Landfall probabilities for the United States coastline remain above their long-period averages - Entire U.S. coastline - 68% (average for last century is 52%), U.S. East Coast Including Peninsula Florida - 43% (average for last century is 31%) and the Gulf Coast from the Florida Panhandle westward to Brownsville - 44% (average for last century is 30%). Read full detailed analysis here.
By Dr. Anthony Lupo, University of Missouri
Recently, there has been a lot written about changes in hurricane frequency and how these changes may be an indicator of climate change. Yet another study has been released indicating that human activity may be partly responsible for the rise in hurricane activity over the course of the 20th century. The latest is a study entitled, ”Heightened Tropical Cyclone Activity in the North Atlantic: Natural Variability or Climate Trend?”, and published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.
However, there are a few problems with the conclusions of the authors. The first and most important is that observation practices have changed radically since the 1900 – 1930 period. Today we have satellites watching over the oceans for hurricane formation. Satellite records have also allowed us to go back and “pick-up” storms that may have been missed previously and add them to the record. Naturally, there should be more tropical storms in the last few years than in the period before 1930. Also, in the most recent decades, the National Hurricane Center has named hurricanes and tropical storms, but also what they call “subtropical storms”. These storms are hybrids which have many characteristics of both tropical storms and non-tropical storms.
The problem described is akin to the change in tornado frequencies since 1900. During the 1920’s, the US averaged roughly 100 tornadoes per year, while during the last few decades, the mean has been closer to 1200. No one would argue that this 10-fold increase in tornado counts is due, even in part, to climate change.
Read full story here.